New Delhi: The final results of UPSC examination 2008 published on May 4 will instil confidence in Muslim youths as the community has shown better performance this year.
Among the 791 successful candidates there are 32 Muslims. This means they are 4.04% of successful candidates, a better progress compared to 3.6% in 2006 and 3.1% in 2007.
Successful Muslim Candidates for UPSC Result 2008
Sr No-----Rank-----ROLL NO----- NAME
01------------20---------002666-----SUFIYAH FARUQUI
02------------26---------010669-----SARF
03------------51---------192126-----SHAI
04------------90---------001339-----SADR
05------------94---------114089-----ABU MATHEN GEORGE
06-----------120---------003004-----KOYA PRAVEEN
07-----------134---------003602-----IMTI
08-----------169---------056251-----ZIAU
09-----------244---------114573-----ASHI
10-----------257---------043392-----BASI
11-----------303---------004357-----SABI
12-----------304---------010883-----ANEE
13-----------353---------008606-----PATT
14-----------382---------010383-----MASH
15-----------393---------104282-----SHAH
16-----------460---------102384-----KAZI SUHAIL ANEESAHMED
17-----------499---------102579-----TARI
18-----------540---------056907-----MOHD SHAHID ALAM
19-----------546---------108290-----MOHD FAIZAN NAYYAR
20----------453--------110054-----AKHT
21-----------582---------303331-----MAHF
22-----------595---------004523-----MD SADIQUE ALAM
23-----------603---------002722-----MD SALIK PARWAIZ
24-----------606---------018478-----MD FAIZUL HAQUE
25-----------619---------079717-----MOHA
26-----------664---------055051-----ABDUL HAKEEM M
27-----------128---------024509-----MASO
28------------75---------079564-----TAMB
29-----------502---------051643-----GEEL
30-----------398---------039145-----CHAN BASHA M
31-----------139---------131443-----AYES
32-----------523---------290928-----R GULZAR BEGUM
http://www.upsc.gov.in/
Category:
IAS Officer,
Inspirations,
Muslim Achievers
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response.
0 Responses